Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Class II malocclusion treatment with a customized dual force distalizer

  • Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Luciano Soldevilla
    ,
  • Marcelo Vinicius Valerio
    ,
  • Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira
    ,
  • Lorena Vilanova
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of São Paulo
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 743-756 (14 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (Volume 160, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2021
  • Published - 11/2021

Publication status

Published - 11/2021

ISSN

0889-5406

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85111482753

Abstract

Intraoral distalizers associated with skeletal anchorage provide the major benefit of promoting molar distalization with minimum anchorage loss and patient cooperation. This case report presents the treatment of a 17-year-old female with Class II Division 2 malocclusion, maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion, mild mandibular retrusion, increased overjet, deepbite, and lip incompetence. The treatment plan involved initial maxillary molar distalization with a customized version of the skeletally anchored dual force distalizer (DFD). The customized DFD used smaller mini-implants and included a fixed anterior biteplane. The device applied simultaneous forces from the buccal and palatal sides directly to the molars using nickel-titanium coil springs and allowed orthodontic mechanics in the mandibular teeth. An overcorrected Class I molar relationship was obtained after 6 months. After the distalization phase, retraction mechanics began with retraction loops and using a modified transpalatal bar reinforced with the mini-implants as anchorage. Moreover, the finishing phase was performed with multiloop edgewise archwires and intermaxillary elastics to enable an individualized control of each tooth. Total treatment time comprised 2 years 4 months, and significant improvements regarding the facial and occlusal perspectives were noticed. Similarly, these favorable changes remained stable during the 2-year follow-up period. The customized version of the skeletally anchored DFD followed by fixed appliances showed effectiveness and stability in Class II malocclusion treatment.

Funding Details

The authors would like to thank the orthodontic faculty staff of Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. This work was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.
FundersFunding numbers
CAPES
-
UNMSM
-