Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Knowledge and attitudes toward rare diseases in Lima, Peru: a cross-sectional study on public awareness of healthcare

  • Hugo Hernán Abarca-Barriga(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Rossana Alvariño Tello
    ,
  • María Cristina Laso-Salazar
    ,
  • Jorge La Serna-Infantes
    ,
  • Maria del Carmen Castro Mujica
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño
    ,
  • Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Ricardo Palma
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

2621388

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Future Rare Diseases (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2026

Publication status

Published - 2026

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105030069032

Abstract

Introduction: Rare diseases (RD) affect up to 8% of the global population; however, public awareness and understanding of RD remain limited. This study assessed knowledge and attitudes toward RD among residents of Lima, Peru. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 424 adult residents of Lima using a structured online questionnaire. Data included sociodemographic characteristics, familiarity with RD, health insurance status, and perspectives on public funding. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Differences in knowledge scores were assessed using Student’s t test and analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression identified factors associated with knowledge, and crude and adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated by knowledge level. Results: The mean RD knowledge score was 53.9 (SD = 14.45), and 85.4% of participants scored below 69, indicating limited knowledge. Despite this, more than 80% supported public funding and insurance coverage for RD. Lower knowledge scores were associated with specific occupations (β = −5.8; p < 0.001), older age (β = −0.21; p = 0.002), and unfavorable attitudes toward insurance coverage (β = −6.7; p = 0.043). Conclusions: Knowledge of RD was limited, but supportive attitudes toward funding highlight opportunities for advocacy and policy development. Limitations include non-probability sampling and possible item misinterpretation.