Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Between Science Journalism and Science Dissemination in Ibero-America: A Documentary Review (2011-2021)

Original title: Entre el periodismo científico y la divulgación científica en Iberoamérica: una revisión documental (2011-2021)
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Article number

a6

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicacion (Volume 23, Issue 45)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/07/2024

Publication status

Published - 01/07/2024

ISSN

1692-2522

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105033831261

Abstract

Science journalism and science dissemination have gained prominence in recent years. Coupled with an increase in scientific production due to the COVID-19 pandemic, journalistic coverage published more and more content about science, which also occurred on digital social networks, where various scientists shared research or new findings. In this line, this research report aims to show how the boundaries of science journalism and science dissemination have been addressed in recent literature, based on publications in SciELO, Scopus, and EBSCO databases over the last 10 years (2011 to 2021) in the Ibero-American sphere. By analyzing 44 papers and research essays written in English, Portuguese, and Spanish languages, the two variables of this research were examined. Findings suggest some lack of clarity in referencing the concept of science dissemination (in half of the articles its meaning is not explicitly defined), as well as the theoretical similarity established between this and science journalism in various studies. The lack of studies on the reception of science news and the impact of science dissemination is highlighted. The main conclusions show that studies on science journalism increasingly focus on content analysis of messages and interviews with journalists to understand the characteristics of their production; however, consensus on the differences between the two professional activities has not yet been achieved.