Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Risk Factors for Conversion in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Middle-Income Country

  • Edith Rodriguez-Prado
    ,
  • Flavia Rioja-Torres
    ,
  • Gabriel De La Cruz-Ku(corresponding author)
    ,
  • César Razuri-Bustamante
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
    ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • ,
  • Hospital de Emergencias José Casimiro Ulloa
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1-12 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Digestive Surgery

Publication milestones

  • Published - 13/03/2026

Publication status

Published - 13/03/2026

ISSN

0253-4886

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105040995256

Abstract

Abstract – Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is preferred for faster recovery and less pain, but conversion to open surgery remains necessary in some cases. Most evidence on conversion comes from high-income countries, while data from low- and middle-income settings (LMIC), where resource limitations may influence surgical decisions, are scarce. This study aimed to identify factors associated with conversion in a public, resource-limited Peruvian hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy at a public hospital in Lima, Peru, between 2022 and 2023. Variables were compared between patients requiring conversion and those completing the procedure laparoscopically. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Results: A total of 523 patients were included. Conversion to open appendicectomy occurred in 4 patients (0.76%), primarily due to difficult dissection from severe adhesions, intraoperative hemorrhage associated with equipment malfunction. Multivariate analysis identified adhesions (OR = 8.91, 95% CI: 1.48–53.42, p = 0.017), appendicolith (OR = 11.49, 95% CI: 1.74–75.69, p = 0.001), and intraoperative complications (OR = 45.74, 95% CI: 6.71–311.55, p < 0.001) as significant factors of conversion. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is safe and effective in public hospitals, even in low-resource settings. Conversion was rare and mainly driven by adhesions, appendicoliths, or intraoperative complications. These findings reinforce that laparoscopic appendicectomy can be reliably performed in LMIC.