Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Military and Civilian Trauma System Integration: A Global Case Series

  • Ghassan T. Alswaiti
    ,
  • Tamara J. Worlton(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Matthew Arnaouti
    ,
  • Gabrielle Cahill
    ,
  • Amy Russell
    ,
  • Gareth R. Hide
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    ,
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
    ,
  • The Royal London Hospital
    ,
  • Harvard Medical School
    ,
  • University of California at San Diego
    ,
  • Royal Centre For Defence Medicine
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 666-673 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Surgical Research (Volume 283)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2023

Publication status

Published - 03/2023

ISSN

0022-4804

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85142872008
  • PubMed: 36455420

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic injury is a leading cause of morbidity globally, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In high-income countries (HICs), it is well documented that military and civilian integration can positively impact trauma care in both healthcare systems, but it is unknown if this synergy could benefit LMICs. This case series examines the variety of integration between the civilian and military systems of various countries and international partnerships to elucidate if there are commonalities in facilitators and barriers. Methods: A convenience sampling method was utilized to identify subject matter experts on civilian and military trauma system integration. Data were collected and coded through an iterative process, focusing on the historical impetuses and subsequent outcomes of civilian and military trauma care collaboration. Results: Eight total case studies were completed, five addressing specific countries and three addressing international partnerships. Themes which emerged as drivers for integration included history of conflict, geography, and skill maintenance for military physicians. High-level government support was a central theme for successful integration, and financial issues were often seen as the greatest barrier. Conclusions: Various approaches in civilian-military integration exist throughout the world, and the studied nations and international partnerships demonstrated similar motivators and barriers to integration. This study highlights the need for further investigation, particularly in LMICs, where less is known about integration strategies.