Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Robotic Omental Flap Harvest for Complex Thoracic Defects: Case Series and Review of the Literature

  • Susana Fortich
    ,
  • Camila Franco-Mesa
    ,
  • Jennifer Den
    ,
  • ,
  • Gal Levy
    ,
  • Roman Petrov(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
    ,
  • ,
  • Howard University
    ,
  • University of Texas Medical Branch, School of Medicine
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

264

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) (Volume 13, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2025

Publication status

Published - 12/2025

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105022808021
  • PubMed: 41283265

Abstract

Objective: The omentum is a highly vascularized and immunologically active tissue with significant regenerative potential. Despite its versatility, its use has traditionally been limited to intra-abdominal applications due to access challenges. Conventional open harvest requires laparotomy, and laparoscopic techniques are hindered by limited visualization and poor ergonomics. We describe the use of robotic-assisted omental flap harvest for thoracic reconstruction, offering a minimally invasive alternative. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent robotic omental flap harvest for intrathoracic reconstruction at a single-center institution between January 2023 and January 2024. Data collected included demographics, indications, surgical technique, operative details, and postoperative outcomes, with a focus on flap viability and complications. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence and experiences with this type of technique. Results: Three patients underwent robotic omental flap harvest for indications including chest wall reconstruction and pleural space obliteration in infected thoracic cavities. The average robotic flap harvest time was 79 ± 13 min, with an estimated ± blood loss of 20 cc. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days, influenced by the primary procedure and patient comorbidities. At an average follow-up of 8 months, all flaps remained viable, with no flap-related complications or losses. The systematic review demonstrated limited data in the current literature regarding this type of surgical approach. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted omental flap harvest is a safe, feasible, and effective technique for complex thoracic reconstructions. It provides a minimally invasive alternative to traditional harvest methods, with reduced morbidity and excellent clinical outcomes. This technique expands the reconstructive options for intrathoracic defects and infections.