Robotic Omental Flap Harvest for Complex Thoracic Defects: Case Series and Review of the Literature
- Susana Fortich,
- Camila Franco-Mesa,
- Jennifer Den,
- ,
- Gal Levy,
- Roman Petrov(corresponding author)
- University of Texas Medical Branch,
- ,
- Howard University,
- University of Texas Medical Branch, School of Medicine
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishArticle number
264Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) (Volume 13, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 12/2025
Publication status
Publication IDs
- Scopus: 105022808021
- PubMed: 41283265
Abstract
Objective: The omentum is a highly vascularized and immunologically active tissue with significant regenerative potential. Despite its versatility, its use has traditionally been limited to intra-abdominal applications due to access challenges. Conventional open harvest requires laparotomy, and laparoscopic techniques are hindered by limited visualization and poor ergonomics. We describe the use of robotic-assisted omental flap harvest for thoracic reconstruction, offering a minimally invasive alternative. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent robotic omental flap harvest for intrathoracic reconstruction at a single-center institution between January 2023 and January 2024. Data collected included demographics, indications, surgical technique, operative details, and postoperative outcomes, with a focus on flap viability and complications. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence and experiences with this type of technique. Results: Three patients underwent robotic omental flap harvest for indications including chest wall reconstruction and pleural space obliteration in infected thoracic cavities. The average robotic flap harvest time was 79 ± 13 min, with an estimated ± blood loss of 20 cc. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days, influenced by the primary procedure and patient comorbidities. At an average follow-up of 8 months, all flaps remained viable, with no flap-related complications or losses. The systematic review demonstrated limited data in the current literature regarding this type of surgical approach. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted omental flap harvest is a safe, feasible, and effective technique for complex thoracic reconstructions. It provides a minimally invasive alternative to traditional harvest methods, with reduced morbidity and excellent clinical outcomes. This technique expands the reconstructive options for intrathoracic defects and infections.
