Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • Rocío Egoávil-Espejo
    ,
  • Barbara Ymaña
    ,
  • ,
  • Dafne Navarro
    ,
  • Rosario Huerto-Huánuco
    ,
  • Gina Salvador-Luján
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • ,
  • Hospital Militar Central
    ,
  • Ciudad Universitaria
    ,
  • AUNA, Peru
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

dlaf082

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/06/2025

Publication status

Published - 01/06/2025

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105005891411

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the activity of cefiderocol against 101 Peruvian Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Methods: Carbapenem- and/or third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were isolated in nine Peruvian health centres. Antibiotic susceptibility was established by automated methods and/or disc diffusion (10 antimicrobial agents), colistin agar test (colistin) and microdilution (cefiderocol). The presence of blaPER, blaCTX-M, blaGES, blaKPC, blaIMI, blaIMP, blaNDM, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-58, blaVIM and oprD was established by PCR; blaCTX-M and oprD were sequenced. The levels of antimicrobial resistance ranged from 20.8% (colistin) to 97.0% (meropenem). Results: The MIC of cefiderocol ranged from   ≤  0.06 to 8 mg/L (one isolate). Cefiderocol resistance rates were 1.0% (according to the FDA and EUCAST) and 0% according to CLSI, whereas 14.9% and 1.0% of isolates were classified as cefiderocol-intermediate according to FDA and CLSI, respectively. CTX-M-131 and GES, and IMP and VIM were the most frequent ESBLs and carbapenemases, respectively. The presence of oprD mutations was tested in 47 carbapenem-resistant isolates, 23 with oprD-inactivating mutations as the sole underlying mechanism. Although no specific association was found between the presence of ESBLs and carbapenemases with cefiderocol resistance, carbapenemase-producing isolates tended to present slightly higher cefiderocol MIC values. The cefiderocol-resistant isolate did not present ESBLs or carbapenemases, showing only an oprD-inactivating mutation. Conclusions: Cefiderocol showed excellent activity against P. aeruginosa, irrespective of the presence of ESBLs and/or carbapenemases. The high number of isolates bordering cefiderocol-resistant levels suggests the need for cautious use and continuous surveillance of this antibiotic.

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well