Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Utility of Individual Neurocognitive Domains of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale to Detect Cognitive Impairment in an Urban Illiterate Population

  • Nilton Custodio(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Marco Malaga
    ,
  • ,
  • Rosa Montesinos
    ,
  • Diego Bustamante-Paytan
    ,
  • Fiorella Baca-Seminario
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista
    ,
  • Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias
    ,
  • ,
  • Unidad de Investigación
    ,
  • Universidad de San Martin de Porres
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 385-393 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (Volume 54, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2025

Publication status

Published - 12/2025

ISSN

1420-8008

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105010276922
  • PubMed: 40602381

Abstract

Abstract – Introduction: Brief cognitive tests like the RUDAS are useful for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, especially in low-literacy populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of the RUDAS by subdomains to detect MCI and dementia in illiterate individuals in Lima, Peru. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of randomly selected illiterate individuals, recruited for validation of RUDAS in Lima, Peru. We compared the RUDAS domain and total scores to a battery of neuropsychological tests (FDS, BDS, ROCF, MINT and Craft 21) using a Spearman correlation coefficient. For diagnostic performance, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for each RUDAS domain. Results: We included 187 patients (64 controls, 60 MCI, and 63 dementia patients). Average RUDAS score was 23.87 ± 0.93, 20.43 ± 1.39, and 14.97 ± 2.21, respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups for all domains, except for ideomotor praxis and visuo-spatial praxis. For convergent validity, most significant correlations from the bivariate analysis remained in the age-adjusted regression, particularly for praxis, memory, and judgment. The total RUDAS score had an AUC of 98% (95% CI: 96–100%) for both MCI and dementia, by domains, judgment, verbal fluency, and memory AUC ranging from 0.7 to 0.8. Conclusions: Our study showed the RUDAS domains of visuo-spatial orientation and memory had an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of dementia. However, further research is needed to validate the use of individual RUDAS items for assessing specific cognitive domains.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well