Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Sleep Quality and Duration Can Influence Junior Physicians’ Performance in High-Level Assessments for Residency Programs

  • Red de Estudiantes Investigadores en Neurociencias
    ,
  • Julio Torales(Author)
    ,
  • Carlos Mena-Canata(Author)
    ,
  • Macarena Morínigo(Author)
    ,
  • Karen Falloon(Author)
    ,
  • Matías Cantero(Author)
  • Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú
    ,
  • Facultad de Ciencias Medicas Universidad Nacional de Asuncion
    ,
  • Universidad Sudamericana
    ,
  • Ministry of Public Health
    ,
  • Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages e272-e280

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Sleep Science (Volume 18, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 16/09/2025

Publication status

Published - 16/09/2025

ISSN

1984-0659

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105008789661

Abstract

Objective To assess the sleep quality and duration among junior physicians in Paraguay during the month and night prior to their assessment for entry into primary specialty medical residency programs. Materials and Methods A self-administered survey based on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was distributed to junior physicians after their National Commission for Medical Residencies (Comisión Nacional de Residencias Médicas – CONAREM, in Spanish) written evaluation. The survey collected data on sleep patterns during the month and night prior to the assessment. The responses were analyzed and matched with physicians’ CONAREM scores. Results The response rate of the survey was 66.3% (270/407 physicians). Among the participants, 150 (55.5%) reported a very poor sleep quality (PSQI > 10). Women scored significantly higher on the PSQI (p ¼ 0.013). A significant association was found between the quality of sleep on the night prior to the CONAREM evaluation and the reported evaluation scores (F-test ¼ 3.55, degree of freedom [df] ¼ 3, p ¼ 0.019). In fact, the night before the written evaluation, 215 participants (79.6%) slept for ≤ 6 hours. A linear relationship was found between the duration of sleep of physicians in the night before the CONAREM written evaluation and the total score obtained in that evaluation (r ¼ 0.200, p < 0.001), suggesting that the more hours they slept, the higher the score they reported. Conclusion The quality and duration of junior physicians’ sleep the night before the high-stakes evaluation positively correlated with their performance scores. These findings highlight the importance of adequate sleep for optimal cognitive performance in high-stress situations.