Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Development and validation of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire

  • Helen M. Haydon
    ,
  • Taylor Major
    ,
  • Jaimon T. Kelly
    ,
  • Soraia de C. Catapan
    ,
  • Liam J. Caffery
    ,
  • Anthony C. Smith
  • University of Queensland
    ,
  • University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 8S-15S

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (Volume 29, Issue 10_suppl)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2023

Publication status

Published - 12/2023

ISSN

1357-633X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85177731290
  • PubMed: 38007698

Abstract

Acceptability (of healthcare services) is an important construct that lacks a consistent definition within research. Addressing this issue, a systematic review led to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. In this study, we describe the development (based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability) and validation of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire. Nineteen items aligning with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability were developed. Two versions of the questionnaire measuring telehealth acceptability by telephone (N = 644) and videoconference appointment (N = 425), were administered to a nationally representative survey of consumers in Australia. Two exploratory factor analyses (Oblimin rotation) were conducted for each scale (telephone/videoconference). Two-factor solutions (5 items each) were found for both (telephone/videoconference) acceptability questionnaires: (a) attitude toward the service as a means to address healthcare needs and affective attitude and (b) individual capacity and effort to use telehealth. Before rotation, Factor 1 of the telephone scale (α = 0.92) measured 56.18% of the variance and Factor 2 (α = 0.86) measured 14.17%. Factor 1 of the videoconference scale (α = 0.90) measured 56.68% of the variance and Factor 2 (α = 0.85) measured 10.63%. The full10-item acceptability questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency (telephone: α = 0.91 and videoconference: α = 0.92). The 2-dimensional Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire is a brief survey based on research evidence and validated in a large Australian sample.