Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Short-term outcomes and risk factors for complications in robotic versus open parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

  • Anshumi Desaif(Author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Jiddu Guarte(Author)
    ,
  • Alba Zevallosb(Author)
    ,
  • Martin Hemerythc(Author)
    ,
  • Flavia Riojac(Author)
  • ,
  • bLoma Linda University Medical Center
    ,
  • cUniversidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • dThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    ,
  • eUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
    ,
  • fUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

62

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Hernia (Volume 30, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published
    - 12/2026

Publication status

Published
- 12/2026

ISSN

1265-4906

External Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105027646482
  • PubMed: 41543767

Abstract

Introduction: Parastomal hernias (PSHs) significantly impact the quality of life and pose risks including obstruction and stoma dysfunction. Minimally invasive approaches, particularly robotic surgery, are increasingly employed for elective PSH repairs, yet comparative outcomes remain insufficiently studied. This study evaluated short-term outcomes comparing robotic and open PSH repairs. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Patients undergoing elective open, laparoscopic, or robotic PSH repairs were identified. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of complications. Results: Of 1,322 patients, 734 (55.5%) underwent open repair, 408 (30.9%) robotic, and 180 (13.6%) laparoscopic. After matching 808 patients (404 robotic, 404 open), robotic repair significantly reduced overall complications (50 patients, 12.4% vs. 101 patients, 25.0%; p < 0.001), surgical complications (22 patients, 5.4% vs. 45 patients, 11.1%; p = 0.003), medical complications (36 patients, 8.9% vs. 66 patients, 16.3%; p = 0.001), superficial surgical site infections (8 patients, 2.0% vs. 26 patients, 6.4%; p = 0.002), and bleeding requiring transfusion (2 patients, 0.5% vs. 13 patients, 3.2%; p = 0.004). Robotic surgery also reduced length of stay (3.26 days vs. 6.08 days; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed robotic technique as an independent protective factor against postoperative complications (OR: 0.414; p < 0.001). (OR: 0.414; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Robotic-assisted PSH repair significantly reduces perioperative morbidity, complication rates, and hospital length of stay compared to open surgery. These results support robotic approaches as preferable for elective PSH repair.