Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Critical habitats for sharks and rays in Asia remain largely unprotected

  • Adriana Gonzalez-Pestana(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Peter M. Kyne
    ,
  • Emiliano García-Rodríguez
    ,
  • Ryan Charles
    ,
  • Vanessa Bettcher Brito
    ,
  • Asia O. Armstrong
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • Charles Darwin University
    ,
  • IUCN Species Survival Commission
    ,
  • University of the Sunshine Coast
    ,
  • Marine Megafauna Foundation
    ,
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

179

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Biodiversity and Conservation (Volume 35, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2026

Publication status

Published - 06/2026

ISSN

0960-3115

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105040518758

Abstract

The Asia region harbors exceptional chondrichthyan (shark, ray, and chimaera) diversity but faces intense fishing pressure. The Important Shark and Ray Area (ISRA) process provides a collaborative, evidence-based framework to identify critical habitats and inform spatial management. We assessed ISRAs across the Bay of Bengal, Southeast Asia, and the Northwest Pacific to characterize their extent, ecological significance, and conservation relevance. We delineated 122 ISRAs spanning ~ 1 million km2 (~ 3% of the region) across 12 jurisdictions and international waters, encompassing habitats for 121 species (~ 30% of Asia’s chondrichthyans), 76% of which are threatened. Depleted taxa (e.g., giant guitarfishes, Glaucostegidae) were represented, but charismatic megafauna (e.g., Whale Shark Rhincodon typus) were overrepresented. In contrast, deepwater and freshwater species were underrepresented. Reproductive Areas were the most common ISRA sub-criterion applied (52% of ISRAs), largely in nearshore zones, while areas for range-restricted species were less frequently (18%) identified. Twelve ISRAs overlapped with biodiversity hotspots, including seven in areas of high overall chondrichthyan species richness and five in areas of high range-restricted species richness. Citizen science was the predominant research method used to delineate ISRAs, while fisheries data were underused despite the region’s major fisheries footprint. Geographic coverage was uneven: Indonesia held the most ISRAs (n = 40; 71.7% of ISRA coverage) while eight jurisdictions (e.g., Viet Nam, China, Republic of Korea) lacked ISRAs due to data gaps. Protection shortfalls are stark: MPAs cover < 5% of national waters in 16 jurisdictions (eight with < 1%); 5.4% of ISRA area lies within MPAs; and only 2.8% of ISRA spatial extent overlaps with no-take zones. These results provide a regional foundation to guide spatial planning, prioritize management, close data gaps, and support recovery of Asia’s diverse and imperiled chondrichthyan assemblages.

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water
  • SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land