Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Can a global score be derived from the Integration of Stressful Life Experiences Scale-Short Form (ISLES-SF)? Empirical support for a bi-factor model

  • Christopher Newport University
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
    ,
  • Portland Institute for Loss and Transition
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 31-39 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Death Studies (Volume 49, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2024
  • Published - 2025

Publication status

Published - 2025

ISSN

0748-1187

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85196263958

Abstract

The Integration of Stressful Life Experiences Scale-Short Form (ISLES-SF) is a popular, two-factor measure of meaning-making. Although researchers have used this instrument to calculate a global index of meaning-making, there has been little evidence to support this practice. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the validity of this approach by analyzing data from 2,380 American adults during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. A series of confirmatory factor analyses, reliability analyses, and concurrent validity analyses support a bi-factor model of meaning-making. These results affirm the practice of not only using the ISLES-SF to measure meaning-making at a global level, but also to interpret its two specific dimensions (Comprehensibility and Footing in the World) as well.