Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Breastfeeding and intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia da Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 14-19 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics (Volume 104)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2015

Publication status

Published - 12/2015

ISSN

0803-5253

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84947216206
  • PubMed: 26211556

Abstract

Aim This study was aimed at systematically reviewing evidence of the association between breastfeeding and performance in intelligence tests. Methods Two independent searches were carried out using Medline, LILACS, SCIELO and Web of Science. Studies restricted to infants and those where estimates were not adjusted for stimulation or interaction at home were excluded. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to pool the effect estimates, and a random-effects regression was used to assess potential sources of heterogeneity. Results We included 17 studies with 18 estimates of the relationship between breastfeeding and performance in intelligence tests. In a random-effects model, breastfed subjects achieved a higher IQ [mean difference: 3.44 points (95% confidence interval: 2.30; 4.58)]. We found no evidence of publication bias. Studies that controlled for maternal IQ showed a smaller benefit from breastfeeding [mean difference 2.62 points (95% confidence interval: 1.25; 3.98)]. In the meta-regression, none of the study characteristics explained the heterogeneity among the studies. Conclusion Breastfeeding is related to improved performance in intelligence tests. A positive effect of breastfeeding on cognition was also observed in a randomised trial. This suggests that the association is causal.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
1168
Social media
186
Citations
564
Mentions
17