Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Body mass index and psychiatric disorders: A Mendelian randomization study

  • Fernando Pires Hartwig
    ,
  • Jack Bowden
    ,
  • ,
  • Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues
    ,
  • George Davey Smith
    ,
  • Bernardo Lessa Horta
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia da Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)
    ,
  • University of Bristol
    ,
  • University of Cambridge
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

32730

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Scientific Reports (Volume 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/09/2016

Publication status

Published - 07/09/2016

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84987678191
  • PubMed: 27601421

Abstract

Obesity is a highly prevalent risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases. Observational studies suggest that obesity is associated with psychiatric traits, but causal inference from such studies has several limitations. We used two-sample Mendelian randomization methods (inverse variance weighting, weighted median and MR-Egger regression) to evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) with three psychiatric traits using data from the Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits and Psychiatric Genomics consortia. Causal odds ratio estimates per 1-standard deviation increment in BMI ranged from 0.88 (95% CI: 0.62; 1.25) to 1.23 (95% CI: 0.65; 2.31) for bipolar disorder; 0.93 (0.78; 1.11) to 1.41 (0.87; 2.27) for schizophrenia; and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.92; 1.44) to 1.40 (95% CI: 1.03; 1.90) for major depressive disorder. Analyses removing potentially influential SNPs suggested that the effect estimates for depression might be underestimated. Our findings do not support the notion that higher BMI increases risk of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Although the point estimates for depression were consistent in all sensitivity analyses, the overall statistical evidence was weak. However, the fact that SNP-depression associations were estimated in relatively small samples reduced power to detect causal effects. This should be re-addressed when SNP-depression associations from larger studies become available.

Funding Details

FundersFunding numbers
MRC
MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UP_1302/2, MR/N501906/1, MC_UU_12013/9, MC_EX_MR/L012286/1, MC_UU_00002/3

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
49
Social media
46
Captures
101

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well