Better estimates of soil carbon from geographical data: a revised global approach
- Sandra Duarte-Guardia,
- Pablo L. Peri,
- Wulf Amelung,
- Douglas Sheil,
- Shawn W. Laffan,
- Nils Borchard
- Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA),
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC) – CONICET,
- University of Bonn,
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences,
- Center for International Forestry Research, West Java,
- University of New South Wales
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 355-372 (18 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (Volume 24, Issue 3)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/03/2019
Publication status
ISSN
1381-2386Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85047264134
Abstract
Soils hold the largest pool of organic carbon (C) on Earth; yet, soil organic carbon (SOC) reservoirs are not well represented in climate change mitigation strategies because our database for ecosystems where human impacts are minimal is still fragmentary. Here, we provide a tool for generating a global baseline of SOC stocks. We used partial least square (PLS) regression and available geographic datasets that describe SOC, climate, organisms, relief, parent material and time. The accuracy of the model was determined by the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of predicted SOC against 100 independent measurements. The best predictors were related to primary productivity, climate, topography, biome classification, and soil type. The largest C stocks for the top 1 m were found in boreal forests (254 ± 14.3 t ha −1 ) and tundra (310 ± 15.3 t ha −1 ). Deserts had the lowest C stocks (53.2 ± 6.3 t ha −1 ) and statistically similar C stocks were found for temperate and Mediterranean forests (142 - 221 t ha−1), tropical and subtropical forests (94 - 143 t ha −1 ) and grasslands (99-104 t ha −1 ). Solar radiation, evapotranspiration, and annual mean temperature were negatively correlated with SOC, whereas soil water content was positively correlated with SOC. Our model explained 49% of SOC variability, with RMSD (0.68) representing approximately 14% of observed C stock variance, overestimating extremely low and underestimating extremely high stocks, respectively. Our baseline PLS predictions of SOC stocks can be used for estimating the maximum amount of C that may be sequestered in soils across biomes.
Funding Details
Access to documents
Publication metrics
Metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 13 Climate Action
