Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

BENEFITS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY ON PT1N0M0 TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER SURVIVAL OUTCOMES

  • Zaida Morante
    ,
  • Yomali Ferreyra
    ,
  • Natalia Valdivieso
    ,
  • ,
  • Tatiana Vidaurre
    ,
  • Guillermo Valencia
  • Oncosalud-AUNA
    ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas
    ,
  • Universidad de Ingenieria y Tecnologia – UTEC
    ,
  • ,
  • Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Ricardo Palma
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 16-25 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana (Volume 24, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2024

Publication status

Published - 2024

ISSN

1814-5469

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85210404465

Abstract

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is notably an aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype, leading to early relapse and poor prognosis. Effects of adjuvant chemotherapy among early-stage TNBC (pT1N0M0) patients remain unclear in different populations. Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) within the specific subset of Peruvian pT1N0M0 TNBC patients (pT1a/b vs. pT1c). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2007 TNBC cases diagnosed between 2000-2014 at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (Lima, Peru). We included only non-metastatic TNBC cases and classified them as pT1N0M0 after surgery. TNBC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We describe our population according to the tumor size from the residue disease (pT1a/b vs. pT1c). We used the Kaplan-Meier method test to determine differences in survival curves for OS and PFS. A Univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify risk factors for PFS. Results: Our study cohort included 124 TNBC patients. Around 65.3% (n=81) were undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Notably, among pT1c patients, this treatment was more prevalent compared to pT1a/b (72.1% vs. 50.0%). Survival analysis showed no significant OS benefit from chemotherapy (HR:2.46,95%CI:0.74-8.13,p=0.13). However, a marked improvement in PFS was noted exclusively in the pT1c subgroup, with patients not treated with chemotherapy offering a prognostic risk (HR:20.10,95% CI:5.54-73.10,p<0.0001). pT1a/b patients demonstrated no benefit from chemotherapy regarding progression (HR:3.07,95% CI:0.27-34.50,p=0.34). Conclusion: Our study highlights that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves PFS in pT1cN0M0 TNBC patients but shows no clear benefit for smaller tumors (pT1a/bN0M0). Future research should focus on personalized chemotherapy strategies in early-stage TNBC to identify predictive markers for survival.

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well