Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Latin American medical students' appraisal on university scientific research training

Original title: Latin American medical students' appraisal on university scientific research training
  • Percy Mayta-Tristán(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Ronny Cartagena-Klein
    ,
  • Reneé Pereyra-Elías
    ,
  • Alejandra Portillo
    ,
  • Alfonso J. Rodríguez-Morales
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
    ,
  • Universidad del Mar, Valparaiso
    ,
  • Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina UPC (SOCIEMUPC)
    ,
  • UCV
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 716-722 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Revista Medica de Chile (Volume 141, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2013

Publication status

Published - 06/2013

ISSN

0034-9887

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84884688804
  • PubMed: 24121574

Abstract

Background: Learning research skills should be a goal during undergraduate training of physicians. Aim: To identify Latin American medical students' appraisal on research skills university training. Material and Methods: A self-administered survey about experience in research, self-assessment of research skills, quality of training in the area received at the university and that importance of publishing as undergraduate students, was answered by 208 medical students aged 23 ± 3 years (54% male), attending a medical students congress. Results: Seventy percent of respondents pertained to medical students' scientific societies and 34% had published in a scientific journal. Fifty two percent considered as good or very good the training level received at their universities on information retrieval and 45% considered good the training in research methodology. Thirty two percent considered as poor or none the training received in scientific writing and 37% in the publishing process. Eighty nine percent considered student publishing as important and 61% perceived limitations in this matter. Conclusions: The university training level received by Latin American medical students on research and publication process was evaluated as deficient by these students.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
52
Usage
58892
Captures
210
Social media
23