Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Application of biochars to sandy and silty soil failed to increase maize yield under common agricultural practice

  • Nils Borchard
    ,
  • Jan Siemens
    ,
  • ,
  • Andreas Möller
    ,
  • Wulf Amelung
  • University of Bonn
    ,
  • Jülich Research Centre
    ,
  • ,
  • University of New South Wales
    ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • Federal Institute for Geo-Science and Natural Resources
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 184-194 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Soil and Tillage Research (Volume 144)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2014

Publication status

Published - 12/2014

ISSN

0167-1987

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84905652879

Abstract

Adding biochar to tropical soils is a strategy for improving crop yield and mitigating climate change, but how various biochar types affect crop yield and the properties of temperate soils is still in dispute. Here, we evaluated how slow-pyrolysis charcoal and two biochars derived from energy production (gasification coke and flash-pyrolysis char) affected the growth of Zea mays L. and the related properties of sandy and silty soils within a 3-year mesocosm experiment. Fertilization was performed to optimize plant growth as would be done under common agricultural practice. Analyses included the monitoring of yield, plant and soil nutrients, aggregate stability, cation exchange and water holding capacity, and black carbon content. The results showed that the added biochars did not affect crop yield at an application rate of 15gbiocharkg-1 of soil. Increasing the application rate of slow-pyrolysis charcoal to 100gkg-1 resulted in decreased plant biomass in the second and third year of the experiment, likely as a result of nutrient imbalances and N-immobilization. We did not detect any degradation of the added black carbon; however, beneficial effects on plants were limited by the small and transient effect of these biochars on the physical and chemical properties of soil. Overall, our results indicate that the added carbon from biochars is stored in soil, but all treatments tested failed to improve plant yield for the studied temperate soils under the given application rates and common agricultural practice.

Funding Details

This study was funded by the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) . Many thanks are owed to Adolf Kiener, Anke Lindecke and Minh-Chi Tran-Thi for the help with laboratory analyses and measurements. The authors thank to Mothermik GmbH for providing the gasification coke and to Pytec GmbH for providing flash-pyrolysis char. Grateful acknowledgement for pre-submission review goes to Claudia Kammann and Nicolas Brüggemann as well as to the editorial board of Soil and Tillage research and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
FundersFunding numbers
BGR
-
German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Social media
1
Captures
270
Citations
159

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action