Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Acupuncture for major depressive disorder: A review of the recommendations stated at clinical practice guidelines

  • Jose Ernesto Fernandez-Chinguel
    ,
  • Sergio Goicochea-Lugo
    ,
  • ,
  • Alvaro Taype-Rondan
    ,
  • Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Independent Researcher
    ,
  • Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud
    ,
  • ,
  • Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

102321

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Complementary Therapies in Medicine (Volume 49)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2020

Publication status

Published - 03/2020

ISSN

0965-2299

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85078456823
  • PubMed: 32147048

Abstract

Background: The use of acupuncture to treat depression is not uncommon. However, recommendations regarding acupuncture issued by clinical practice guidelines (CPG) vary widely. Objective: To describe the recommendations regarding acupuncture in CPGs for depression in adults, and to assess the methodology used to reach them. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of CPGs for depression management in adults, which performed systematic reviews (SRs) to answer their review questions, were published between January 2014 and May 2018, and assessed the use of acupuncture as a review question. We limited out search to articles published in English/Spanish. We assessed the SRs quality using the “A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2” (AMSTAR-2), and described how the recommendation regarding acupuncture was reached. Findings: We found five CPGs that fulfilled our inclusion criteria: three from the US, one from Canada, and one from China. Four CPGs fulfilled between two and three items of AMSTAR-2, and one CPG fulfilled seven items. The methodology used to formulate the recommendations varied between CPGs. Regarding acupuncture use recommendations: three CPGs did not issue any recommendation (although one mentions that it should not be used), whilst two were in favor. Discussions: The lack of a clearly stated review question presented in the majority of CPGs prevents the reader from understanding what the CPG developing group was trying to answer. Moreover, the arguments presented to support a decision are usually not detailed enough. Therefore, the assessment of the recommendations was extremely difficult. Clinical implications: Given that the formulation of recommendations is not always reliable, clinicians should carefully read and assess the recommendations presented in CPGs before implementing them.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
6
Captures
34

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well