A cross-sectional study exploring equity of access to telehealth in culturally and linguistically diverse communities in a major health service
- ,
- Jaimon T. Kelly,
- Karen Lucas,
- Centaine L. Snoswell,
- Helen M. Haydon,
- Sue Pager
- University of Queensland,
- Metro South Health,
- DHealth Equity and Access Unit,
- University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 721-728 (8 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Australian Health Review (Volume 47, Issue 6)Publication milestones
- Published - 21/11/2023
Publication status
ISSN
0156-5788Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85179129729
- PubMed: 37983641
Abstract
Objectives. The utilisation of telehealth among culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Australia remains unexplored. We aimed to describe telehealth (telephone and videoconference) utilisation within a major health service and identify sociodemographic factors that may contribute to limited telehealth access. Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed using service activity data from four metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Outpatient department data (January to December 2021) were examined. These data included patients (N = 153 427) of all ages who had an outpatient appointment within 10 speciality services (i.e. Hepatology, Gastroenterology, Immunology and Psychology) that were the most frequent videoconference users. This study measured telehealth utilisation across the four tertiary hospitals and its association with sociodemographic factors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used. Multivariate regression models were adjusted by sex, socioeconomic level and language use. Results. Overall, 39% of appointments were delivered through telehealth, with 65% of all reported telehealth services involving a telephone consultation. People who required interpreter services were 66% less likely to use telehealth services (OR adjusted 0.33, 95% CI 0.31–0.36, P < 0.05) than English-speaking people. Among those using telehealth, people requiring interpreter services were 13% less likely to use videoconference than phone (OR adjusted 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98, P < 0.005). Conclusion. There is a gap in Australian telehealth service use for people with culturally diverse backgrounds and limited English proficiency. This study highlights a critical need to determine how people from culturally diverse backgrounds would like to engage with digital care options such as telehealth and the necessary support to enable this.
