Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A comparative evaluation of endodontically treated root canals obturated using gutta-percha with two different protocols: An in-vitro study

  • Arnaldo Munive-Degregori
    ,
  • Frank Mayta-Tovalino(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Cecilia Lúcar-Flores
    ,
  • Roman Mendoza
    ,
  • Daniel Alvitez-Temoche
    ,
  • Carlos Guillen-Galarza
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 678-684 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry (Volume 11, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/11/2021

Publication status

Published - 01/11/2021

ISSN

2231-0762

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85120954437

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student's t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. Results: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm 3 for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters.