El animal, ¿es una otredad posible? Indagaciones fenomenolÓgicas a partir de Husserl y Heidegger

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This article aims to analyze the concept of animahty from the perspective of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. More precisely, the question arises as to whether the animal possesses the status of otherness or lacks it. Indeed, the animal, with respect to the human, turns out to be another entity, but, from the assumptions of phenomenology, is that enough for it to be apprehended as an intersubjectivity or a coexistence that is donated to the world of human beings? To answer this question, we will review Husserl's argumentation, especially in Hua TV and Hua XXXIX, and Heidegger's in GA 2 and GA 29/30. Finally, we will add a critical consideration of the ideas of the authors studied in the face of developments in contemporary biology to ask ourselves to what extent their philosophical inquiry would be consistent with current zoological evidence.

Título traducido de la contribuciónThe animal, is it a possible otherness? Phenomenological inquiries from husserl and heidegger.
Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)133-158
Número de páginas26
PublicaciónTrans/Form/Acao
Volumen46
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2023

Palabras clave

  • Animal
  • Biology
  • Heidegger
  • Husserl
  • Otherness
  • Phenomenology

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'El animal, ¿es una otredad posible? Indagaciones fenomenolÓgicas a partir de Husserl y Heidegger'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto