TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - Convergence between the dimensional PD models of ICD-11 and DSM-5: a meta-analytic approach (Front. Psychiatry., (2013), 14, 1325583, 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1325583)

AU - Hualparuca-Olivera, Luis

AU - Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás

AU - Torales, Julio

AU - Ramos-Campos, Dayana

N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Hualparuca-Olivera, Caycho-Rodríguez, Torales and Ramos-Campos.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - In the published article, there was an error in Table 1, 7. Damovsky et al. (35), Column 6. Two incorrect r coefficients were mentioned. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, they should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. The correct Figure 1 appears below. In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure S3. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in 3 Results, 3.1 Description of the chosen studies, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The corrected sentence appears below: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0.26 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

AB - In the published article, there was an error in Table 1, 7. Damovsky et al. (35), Column 6. Two incorrect r coefficients were mentioned. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, they should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. The correct Figure 1 appears below. In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure S3. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in 3 Results, 3.1 Description of the chosen studies, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The corrected sentence appears below: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0.26 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

KW - DSM-5

KW - ICD-11

KW - convergent validity

KW - dimensional models

KW - meta-analysis

KW - personality disorder

KW - severity

KW - traits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189609697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1366574

DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1366574

M3 - Comentario/Debate

AN - SCOPUS:85189609697

SN - 1664-0640

VL - 15

JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry

JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry

M1 - 1366574

ER -