Automated Multicohort Mobility Assessment With an Instrumented L-Test (iL-test)

Jose Albites-Sanabria, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Ilaria D'Ascanio, Tecla Bonci, Marco Caruso, Francesca Salis, Andrea Cereatti, Silvia Del Din, Lisa Alcock, Arne Kuederle, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Eran Gazit, Felix Kluge, Cameron Kirk, M. Encarna Mico-Amigo, Kirsty Scott, Clint Hansen, Jochen Klenk, Lars Schwickert, Dimitrios MegaritisIoannis Vogiatzis, Clemens Becker, Walter Maetzler, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Brian Caulfield, Beatrix Vereijken, Lynn Rochester, Arne Muller, Claudia Mazza, Ilaria Carpinella, Thomas Bowman, Roberta De Ciechi, Alessandro Torchio, Davide Cattaneo, Simona Bianchi, Maurizio Ferrarin, Pericle Randi, Lucrezia Piraccini, Angelo Davalli, Lorenzo Chiari, Luca Palmerini

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

The L-test is a performance-based measure to assess balance and mobility. Currently, the primary outcome from this test is the time required to finish it. In this study we present the instrumented L-test (iL-test), an L-test wherein mobility is evaluated by means of a wearable inertial sensor worn at the lower back. We analyzed data from 113 people across seven cohorts: healthy adults, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, Parkinson's disease, proximal femoral fracture, and transfemoral amputation. The iL-test automatic segmentation was validated using stereophotogrammetry. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 164 kinematic features derived from inertial signals to identify distinct patterns across different cohorts. The iL-test accurately recognized and segmented activities during the L-test for all cohorts (technical validity). A random forest classifier revealed that proximal femoral fracture and transfemoral amputation induced significantly different mobility patterns compared to healthy people with AUC values of 0.89 and 0.99, respectively. Strong correlations were found between kinematic features and clinical scores in multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, proximal femoral fracture, and transfemoral amputation, with consistent patterns of decreased movement ranges and smoothness with increasing disease severity. Furthermore, features derived from 90° and 180° turns were found to be important contributors to differentiation amongst cohorts, underscoring the need to evaluate different turn degrees and directions. This study emphasizes the iL-test potential to deliver automated mobility assessment across a wide range of clinical conditions, indicating a prospective avenue for improved mobility assessment and, eventually, more informed healthcare interventions.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)717-727
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volumen33
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2025
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Automated Multicohort Mobility Assessment With an Instrumented L-Test (iL-test)'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto