TY - JOUR
T1 - Xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recession
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Zegarra-Caceres, Lorena
AU - Orellano-Merluzzi, Ariana
AU - Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
AU - de Souza, Sérgio Luis Scombatti
AU - Faveri, Marcelo
AU - Meza-Mauricio, Jonathan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2023.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - The aim of this systematic review (SR) compared the effect of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) vs. connective tissue graft (CTG) for the treatment of multiple gingival recession (MGR) Miller Class I and II or Cairo type I. Five databases were searched up to August 2022 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical effects of XCM vs. CTG in the treatment of MGR. The random effects model of mean differences was used to determine reduction of gingival recession (GR), gain in keratinized tissue width (KTW), gain in gingival thickness (GT) and gain in clinical attachment level (CAL). The risk ratio was used to complete root coverage (CRC) at 6 and 12 months. 10 RCTs, representing 1095 and 649 GR at 6 and 12 months, respectively, were included in this SR. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in GR reduction, KTW gain GT gain or CAL gain between groups at 6 months. However, at 12 months of follow-up, differences favoring the control group were observed (p < 0.05). CRC was significantly higher in the CTG group at 6 and 12 months. Regarding dentine hypersensitivity (DH), no statistically significant differences were found between groups at 6 and 12 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). At 12 months, CTG showed significantly superior clinical results in the treatment of MGR: however, this difference was not observed in the decrease of DH.
AB - The aim of this systematic review (SR) compared the effect of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) vs. connective tissue graft (CTG) for the treatment of multiple gingival recession (MGR) Miller Class I and II or Cairo type I. Five databases were searched up to August 2022 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical effects of XCM vs. CTG in the treatment of MGR. The random effects model of mean differences was used to determine reduction of gingival recession (GR), gain in keratinized tissue width (KTW), gain in gingival thickness (GT) and gain in clinical attachment level (CAL). The risk ratio was used to complete root coverage (CRC) at 6 and 12 months. 10 RCTs, representing 1095 and 649 GR at 6 and 12 months, respectively, were included in this SR. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in GR reduction, KTW gain GT gain or CAL gain between groups at 6 months. However, at 12 months of follow-up, differences favoring the control group were observed (p < 0.05). CRC was significantly higher in the CTG group at 6 and 12 months. Regarding dentine hypersensitivity (DH), no statistically significant differences were found between groups at 6 and 12 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). At 12 months, CTG showed significantly superior clinical results in the treatment of MGR: however, this difference was not observed in the decrease of DH.
KW - Acellular dermis
KW - Connective tissue graft
KW - Coronally advanced flap
KW - Gingival recessions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174971709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10266-023-00863-4
DO - 10.1007/s10266-023-00863-4
M3 - Artículo de revisión
C2 - 37898589
AN - SCOPUS:85174971709
SN - 1618-1247
VL - 112
SP - 317
EP - 340
JO - Odontology
JF - Odontology
IS - 2
ER -