The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease

Erin Thorpe, Taylor Williams, Chad Shaw, Evgenii Chekalin, Julia Ortega, Keisha Robinson, Jason Button, Marilyn C. Jones, Miguel del Campo, Donald Basel, Julie McCarrier, Laura Davis Keppen, Erin Royer, Romina Foster-Bonds, Milagros M. Duenas-Roque, Nora Urraca, Kerri Bosfield, Chester W. Brown, Holly Lydigsen, Henry J. MroczkowskiJewell Ward, Fabio Sirchia, Elisa Giorgio, Keith Vaux, Hildegard Peña Salguero, Aimé Lumaka, Gerrye Mubungu, Prince Makay, Mamy Ngole, Prosper Tshilobo Lukusa, Adeline Vanderver, Kayla Muirhead, Omar Sherbini, Melissa D. Lah, Katelynn Anderson, Jeny Bazalar-Montoya, Richard S. Rodriguez, Mario Cornejo-Olivas, Karina Milla-Neyra, Marwan Shinawi, Pilar Magoulas, Duncan Henry, Kate Gibson, Samuel Wiafe, Parul Jayakar, Daria Salyakina, Diane Masser-Frye, Arturo Serize, Jorge E. Perez, Alan Taylor, Shruti Shenbagam, Ahmad Abou Tayoun, Alka Malhotra, Maren Bennett, Vani Rajan, James Avecilla, Andrew Warren, Max Arseneault, Tasha Kalista, Ali Crawford, Subramanian S. Ajay, Denise L. Perry, John Belmont, Ryan J. Taft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9–3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1–∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5–1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1271-1281
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume111
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • change of management
  • clinical genome testing
  • clinical utility
  • diagnostic equity
  • genetic testing
  • low- and middle-income
  • rare disease
  • rare genetic disease
  • whole-genome sequencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this