TY - JOUR
T1 - The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants
T2 - current situation and future trends
AU - Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez
AU - Abdelaal, Abdelaziz
AU - Umar, Tungki Pratama
AU - El-Sakka, Amro A.
AU - Benmelouka, Amira Yasmine
AU - Albakri, Khaled
AU - Ali, Iftikhar
AU - Al-Ahdal, Tareq
AU - Abdelazeem, Basel
AU - Sah, Ranjit
AU - Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, EDIMES Edizioni Medico Scientifiche. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has been the most recent variant of concern (VOC) established by the World Health Organization (WHO). Because of its greater infectivity and immune evasion, this variant quickly became the dominant type of circulating SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. Our literature review thoroughly explains the current state of Omicron emergence, particularly by comparing different omicron subvariants, including BA.2, BA.1, and BA.3. Such elaboration would be based on structural variations, mutations, clinical manifestation, transmissibility, pathogenicity, and vaccination effectiveness. The most notable difference between the three subvariants is the insufficiency of deletion (Δ69-70) in the spike protein, which results in a lower detection rate of the spike (S) gene target known as (S) gene target failure (SGTF). Furthermore, BA.2 had a stronger affinity to the human Angioten-sin-converting Enzyme (hACE2) receptor than other Omicron sub-lineages. Regarding the number of muta-tions, BA.1.1 has the most (40), followed by BA.1, BA.3, and BA.3 with 39, 34, and 31 mutations, respectively. In addition, BA.2 and BA.3 have greater transmissibility than other sub-lineages (BA.1 and BA.1.1). These characteristics are primarily responsible for Omicron’s vast geographical spread and high contagiousness rates, particularly BA.2 sub-lineages.
AB - The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has been the most recent variant of concern (VOC) established by the World Health Organization (WHO). Because of its greater infectivity and immune evasion, this variant quickly became the dominant type of circulating SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. Our literature review thoroughly explains the current state of Omicron emergence, particularly by comparing different omicron subvariants, including BA.2, BA.1, and BA.3. Such elaboration would be based on structural variations, mutations, clinical manifestation, transmissibility, pathogenicity, and vaccination effectiveness. The most notable difference between the three subvariants is the insufficiency of deletion (Δ69-70) in the spike protein, which results in a lower detection rate of the spike (S) gene target known as (S) gene target failure (SGTF). Furthermore, BA.2 had a stronger affinity to the human Angioten-sin-converting Enzyme (hACE2) receptor than other Omicron sub-lineages. Regarding the number of muta-tions, BA.1.1 has the most (40), followed by BA.1, BA.3, and BA.3 with 39, 34, and 31 mutations, respectively. In addition, BA.2 and BA.3 have greater transmissibility than other sub-lineages (BA.1 and BA.1.1). These characteristics are primarily responsible for Omicron’s vast geographical spread and high contagiousness rates, particularly BA.2 sub-lineages.
KW - BA.2 sub-lineages
KW - COVID-19
KW - Omicron variant
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - immune evasion
KW - spike protein
KW - transmissibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143418404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.53854/liim-3004-2
DO - 10.53854/liim-3004-2
M3 - Artículo de revisión
AN - SCOPUS:85143418404
SN - 1124-9390
VL - 30
SP - 480
EP - 494
JO - Infezioni in Medicina
JF - Infezioni in Medicina
IS - 4
ER -