Mobile health apps for cardiovascular risk assessment: a systematic review

Fabian A. Chavez-Ecos, Rodrigo Chavez-Ecos, Carlos Vergara Sanchez, Miguel A. Chavez-Gutarra, Anandita Agarwala, Kiara Camacho-Caballero

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: mHealth apps (MHA) are emerging as promising tools for cardiovascular risk assessment, but few meet the standards required for clinical use. We aim to evaluate the quality and functionality of mHealth apps for cardiovascular risk assessment by healthcare professionals. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of MHA for cardiovascular risk assessment in the Apple Store, Play Store, and Microsoft Store until August 2023. Our eligibility criteria were based on the 2021 European Society Cardiology Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice, the Framingham Risk Score, and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score. Our protocol was drafted using the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. To assess quality, we used the validated Mobile Apps Rating Scale (MARS) score, which includes 19 items across four objective scales (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality) and one additional subjective scale. For functionality evaluation, we used the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics functionality scale. We performed data synthesis by generating descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 18 MHA were included in the review. The most common scores used were the Framingham score, ASCVD score, and Score 2. Only six apps achieved an overall score of 4 or greater in the MARS evaluation. The MHA with the highest MARS score was ESC CVD Risk Calculation (5 points), followed by ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus (4.9 points). In the IMS scale, four MHA had a high functionality score: ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus (5 points), ESC CVD Risk Calculation (5 points), MDCalc Medical Calculator (4 points), and Calculate by QsMD (4 points). Discussion: A gap exists in the availability of high-quality MHA designed for healthcare professionals to facilitate shared decision-making in cardiovascular risk assessment. Systematic Review Registration: The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, identifier CRD42023453807.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1420274
JournalFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • cardiology
  • heart disease risk factors
  • mobile applications (apps)
  • risk assessment
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mobile health apps for cardiovascular risk assessment: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this