TY - JOUR
T1 - Microshear bond strength of dual-cure resin cement in zirconia after different cleaning techniques
T2 - ani n vitro study
AU - Atoche-Socola, Katherine Joselyn
AU - Arriola-Guillén, Luis Ernesto
AU - López-Flores, Ana Isabel
AU - Garcia, Isadora Martini
AU - Huertas-Mogollón, Gustavo
AU - Collares, Fabrício Mezzomo
AU - Leitune, Vicente Castelo Branco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - PURPOSE. This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (p.SBS) of dual-cure resin cement in CAD-CAM zirconia after different cleaning techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty discs of zirconia-based ceramic from Ivoclar Vivadent were embedded in acrylic resin. The discs were divided into five groups according to the cleaning methods used: Group 1: drying with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3; Group 2: washed with water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3; Group 3: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + zirconium oxide (Ivoclean); Group 4: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + potassium hydroxide (Zirclean); and Group 5: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + 1% NaClO. All of the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva for 1 minute and then cleaned. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey's tests. RESULTS. There were statistically significant differences among all groups for p.SBS (P<. 05). The group treated with zirconium oxide (Group 3) showed the highest p.SBS (18.75 ± 0.23 MPa). CONCLUSION. When applied to zirconia, the cleaning methods affected the bonding with resin cement differently.
AB - PURPOSE. This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (p.SBS) of dual-cure resin cement in CAD-CAM zirconia after different cleaning techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty discs of zirconia-based ceramic from Ivoclar Vivadent were embedded in acrylic resin. The discs were divided into five groups according to the cleaning methods used: Group 1: drying with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3; Group 2: washed with water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3; Group 3: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + zirconium oxide (Ivoclean); Group 4: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + potassium hydroxide (Zirclean); and Group 5: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + 1% NaClO. All of the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva for 1 minute and then cleaned. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey's tests. RESULTS. There were statistically significant differences among all groups for p.SBS (P<. 05). The group treated with zirconium oxide (Group 3) showed the highest p.SBS (18.75 ± 0.23 MPa). CONCLUSION. When applied to zirconia, the cleaning methods affected the bonding with resin cement differently.
KW - Ceramics
KW - Cleaning
KW - Dental cements
KW - Mechanical test
KW - Zirconia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114841033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.237
DO - 10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.237
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85114841033
SN - 2005-7806
VL - 13
SP - 237
EP - 245
JO - Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
JF - Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
IS - 4
ER -