Lectura crítica de evidencia médica en el contexto de COVID-19:¿Cómo leer estudios observacionales?

Translated title of the contribution: Critical reading of medical evidence: How to read observational studies?

Joshuan J. Barboza, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Diego F. Pinto-Ruiz, José Caballero-Alvarado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objetive. The critical reading of scientific articles allows the medical community, above all, to improve the context of decision making. The great amount of scientific production worldwide makes use of observational studies, however, a significant proportion is not useful for decision making, not because of its methodological limitations but because of errors in its application. Many studies published in relation to coronavirus 2019 disease have limitations and require statistical, epidemiological and clinical tools to be able to assess them and incorporate them into the practice of evidence-based medicine. In this review, we analyze the different observational research designs and with the help of examples we will see the different steps in the research process.

Translated title of the contributionCritical reading of medical evidence: How to read observational studies?
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)410-417
Number of pages8
JournalRevista del Cuerpo Medico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical reading of medical evidence: How to read observational studies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this