TY - JOUR
T1 - In Vitro Efficacy of Domestic Techniques for Disinfection of Toothbrushes Contaminated With Enterococcus faecalis
AU - Donayre-Salvatierra, Gina Alessandra
AU - Dulanto-Vargas, Julissa Amparo
AU - Olaechea, Raul M.
AU - Reátegui, Oscar
AU - Carranza-Samanez, Kilder Maynor
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Gina Alessandra Donayre-Salvatierra et al.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction: Oral hygiene education for patients is fundamental in preventive-promotional dentistry. The disinfection of toothbrushes (TBs) must be integrated into this context due to their proximity to contaminant sources that make them vulnerable to cross infection in homes. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of domestic techniques for disinfection of TBs. Materials and Methods: We performed an in vitro study of 76 TBs contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (Ef) ATCC 29212 subjected to different disinfection protocols: G1. Distilled water (DW; negative control; n = 8), G2. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)10% (negative control; n = 8), G3. Chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.12% (positive control; n = 15), G4. 100% white vinegar (WV; n = 15), G5. Microwave (MW) at 700 W (n = 15), and G6. 200 mg/mL of certified alcoholic extract of purple garlic (GARLIC) from Arequipa (Allium sativum L; n = 15). Bacterial count was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU/mL) categorized as contamination: low (<30), medium (30–300), and high (>300). The Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc pairs was used at a significance level of p<0:05. Results: Efficacy against Ef showed highly significant differences between groups (p<0:001) with lower median CFU/mL in G3 and G4 (Me = 0 [IQR (interquartile range) = 0]: low) and G5 (Me = 6000 [IQR = 45,000]: low/medium) versus negative controls (Me = 378,500 and 5,020,000 [IQR = 4,605,000 and 6,760,000]: medium/high; p ≤ 0:019). The counts of the G5 were not statistically different than G3, G4, and G6 (p>0:06). The G6 (Me = 1,510,000 [IQR = 590,000]: medium) was inferior to G3 and G4 (p<0:001), but similar to both negative control groups (p>0:999). Conclusions: Disinfection of TBs with CHX, WV, and MWs produces a significant effective reduction in the count of Ef.
AB - Introduction: Oral hygiene education for patients is fundamental in preventive-promotional dentistry. The disinfection of toothbrushes (TBs) must be integrated into this context due to their proximity to contaminant sources that make them vulnerable to cross infection in homes. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of domestic techniques for disinfection of TBs. Materials and Methods: We performed an in vitro study of 76 TBs contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (Ef) ATCC 29212 subjected to different disinfection protocols: G1. Distilled water (DW; negative control; n = 8), G2. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)10% (negative control; n = 8), G3. Chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.12% (positive control; n = 15), G4. 100% white vinegar (WV; n = 15), G5. Microwave (MW) at 700 W (n = 15), and G6. 200 mg/mL of certified alcoholic extract of purple garlic (GARLIC) from Arequipa (Allium sativum L; n = 15). Bacterial count was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU/mL) categorized as contamination: low (<30), medium (30–300), and high (>300). The Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc pairs was used at a significance level of p<0:05. Results: Efficacy against Ef showed highly significant differences between groups (p<0:001) with lower median CFU/mL in G3 and G4 (Me = 0 [IQR (interquartile range) = 0]: low) and G5 (Me = 6000 [IQR = 45,000]: low/medium) versus negative controls (Me = 378,500 and 5,020,000 [IQR = 4,605,000 and 6,760,000]: medium/high; p ≤ 0:019). The counts of the G5 were not statistically different than G3, G4, and G6 (p>0:06). The G6 (Me = 1,510,000 [IQR = 590,000]: medium) was inferior to G3 and G4 (p<0:001), but similar to both negative control groups (p>0:999). Conclusions: Disinfection of TBs with CHX, WV, and MWs produces a significant effective reduction in the count of Ef.
KW - Allium sativum
KW - disinfection
KW - microwave
KW - toothbrush
KW - vinegar
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216271368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2024/3509832
DO - 10.1155/2024/3509832
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85216271368
SN - 1687-8728
VL - 2024
JO - International Journal of Dentistry
JF - International Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 3509832
ER -