El animal, ¿es una otredad posible? Indagaciones fenomenolÓgicas a partir de Husserl y Heidegger

Translated title of the contribution: The animal, is it a possible otherness? Phenomenological inquiries from husserl and heidegger.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the concept of animahty from the perspective of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. More precisely, the question arises as to whether the animal possesses the status of otherness or lacks it. Indeed, the animal, with respect to the human, turns out to be another entity, but, from the assumptions of phenomenology, is that enough for it to be apprehended as an intersubjectivity or a coexistence that is donated to the world of human beings? To answer this question, we will review Husserl's argumentation, especially in Hua TV and Hua XXXIX, and Heidegger's in GA 2 and GA 29/30. Finally, we will add a critical consideration of the ideas of the authors studied in the face of developments in contemporary biology to ask ourselves to what extent their philosophical inquiry would be consistent with current zoological evidence.

Translated title of the contributionThe animal, is it a possible otherness? Phenomenological inquiries from husserl and heidegger.
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)133-158
Number of pages26
JournalTrans/Form/Acao
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The animal, is it a possible otherness? Phenomenological inquiries from husserl and heidegger.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this