TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronally advanced flap achieved higher esthetic outcomes without a connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions
T2 - a 4-year randomized clinical trial
AU - Gil, Stephany
AU - de la Rosa, Manuel
AU - Mancini, Evelyn
AU - Dias, Antonio
AU - Barootchi, Shayan
AU - Tavelli, Lorenzo
AU - Mendoza-azpur, Gerardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Objectives: Limited long-term data are available when comparing the esthetic outcomes of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without a connective tissue graft (CTG). The aim of this study was to compare the 4-year esthetic outcomes of CAF vs CAF + CTG for the treatment of isolated maxillary gingival recessions. Material and methods: Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned for treatment either with CAF (control; N = 24) or to CAF + CTG (test group; N = 24). Patients were followed after the surgery until the final evaluation. A professional esthetic evaluation was performed using the Root coverage Esthetic Score (RES). Recession reduction, mean root coverage, and complete root coverage were also evaluated. Results: Forty-two patients completed the study at the 4-year recall. A significant recession reduction was evident at 4 years, without significant intergroup differences. The CAF group showed a statistically significant higher final RES compared with the CAF + CTG group (9.14 ± 1.08 vs 7.25 ± 1.29, respectively, p < 0.001). Regarding the individual components of RES, gingival margin and marginal tissue contour were significantly higher in the CAF group compared with that in the CAF + CTG group. Conclusions: CAF presented with a significantly higher overall esthetic score than CAF + CTG, and in the individual RES components of marginal tissue contour and gingival margin after 4 years. Clinical relevance: CAF without the addition of CTG provided higher esthetic outcomes for the treatment of isolated gingival recessions.
AB - Objectives: Limited long-term data are available when comparing the esthetic outcomes of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without a connective tissue graft (CTG). The aim of this study was to compare the 4-year esthetic outcomes of CAF vs CAF + CTG for the treatment of isolated maxillary gingival recessions. Material and methods: Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned for treatment either with CAF (control; N = 24) or to CAF + CTG (test group; N = 24). Patients were followed after the surgery until the final evaluation. A professional esthetic evaluation was performed using the Root coverage Esthetic Score (RES). Recession reduction, mean root coverage, and complete root coverage were also evaluated. Results: Forty-two patients completed the study at the 4-year recall. A significant recession reduction was evident at 4 years, without significant intergroup differences. The CAF group showed a statistically significant higher final RES compared with the CAF + CTG group (9.14 ± 1.08 vs 7.25 ± 1.29, respectively, p < 0.001). Regarding the individual components of RES, gingival margin and marginal tissue contour were significantly higher in the CAF group compared with that in the CAF + CTG group. Conclusions: CAF presented with a significantly higher overall esthetic score than CAF + CTG, and in the individual RES components of marginal tissue contour and gingival margin after 4 years. Clinical relevance: CAF without the addition of CTG provided higher esthetic outcomes for the treatment of isolated gingival recessions.
KW - Connective tissue graft
KW - Esthetics
KW - Gingival recession
KW - Surgical flaps
KW - Tooth root
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091420357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00784-020-03587-9
DO - 10.1007/s00784-020-03587-9
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 32974775
AN - SCOPUS:85091420357
SN - 1432-6981
VL - 25
SP - 2727
EP - 2735
JO - Clinical Oral Investigations
JF - Clinical Oral Investigations
IS - 5
ER -