TY - JOUR
T1 - Compressive Stress in Teeth Restored with Endocrown and Build-up
T2 - A Finite Element Analysis
AU - Bardales-Espinoza, Katherinne A.
AU - Mora-Ipince, Anderson R.
AU - Chávez-Méndez, Martín A.
AU - Peña-Soto, Claudio
AU - Flores-Fraile, Javier
AU - De la Garza-Ramos, Myriam A.
AU - Cano-Verdugo, Guillermo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© (2024), (Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd). All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Aim: This study evaluates compressive stress in teeth restored with endocrown (ECW) and build-up (BUP) using finite element analysis (FEA). Understanding stress distribution in dental restorations is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and longevity. Materials and methods: A second lower molar was modeled using Solidworks® (Version 2017). The ECW was simulated with nanoceramic resin, while the BUP included a core and nanoceramic crown. Mechanical properties, including modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio, and tensile strength were assigned to materials. Axial and oblique loads of 900N were applied, and stress was analyzed using Solidworks®. Results: Results indicated that under axial loading, ECW experienced a maximum stress of 91.9 MPa, significantly higher than BUP’s 49 MPa. Under oblique loading, ECW exhibited 132 MPa compared with 116 MPa in BUP. The highest stress concentration was in the cervical area, where ECW showed greater stresses in both the substrate and restored area. Build-up demonstrated better stress distribution and lower fracture risk. Conclusion: Endocrown restoration results in higher compressive stresses, especially in the cervical region, which may increase the risk of fracture. Conversely, the BUP technique, which preserves cervical dentin, offers improved stress distribution and reduced fracture risk, making it a more robust solution for endodontic rehabilitation. Clinical significance: This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate restoration methods to minimize stress and enhance the longevity of dental treatments, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.
AB - Aim: This study evaluates compressive stress in teeth restored with endocrown (ECW) and build-up (BUP) using finite element analysis (FEA). Understanding stress distribution in dental restorations is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and longevity. Materials and methods: A second lower molar was modeled using Solidworks® (Version 2017). The ECW was simulated with nanoceramic resin, while the BUP included a core and nanoceramic crown. Mechanical properties, including modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio, and tensile strength were assigned to materials. Axial and oblique loads of 900N were applied, and stress was analyzed using Solidworks®. Results: Results indicated that under axial loading, ECW experienced a maximum stress of 91.9 MPa, significantly higher than BUP’s 49 MPa. Under oblique loading, ECW exhibited 132 MPa compared with 116 MPa in BUP. The highest stress concentration was in the cervical area, where ECW showed greater stresses in both the substrate and restored area. Build-up demonstrated better stress distribution and lower fracture risk. Conclusion: Endocrown restoration results in higher compressive stresses, especially in the cervical region, which may increase the risk of fracture. Conversely, the BUP technique, which preserves cervical dentin, offers improved stress distribution and reduced fracture risk, making it a more robust solution for endodontic rehabilitation. Clinical significance: This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate restoration methods to minimize stress and enhance the longevity of dental treatments, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.
KW - Build-up
KW - Compressive stress
KW - Endocrown
KW - Finite element analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216553394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3777
DO - 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3777
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 39905608
AN - SCOPUS:85216553394
SN - 1526-3711
VL - 25
SP - 1027
EP - 1033
JO - Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
JF - Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
IS - 11
ER -