TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Manifestations
AU - Custodio, Nilton
AU - Malaga, Marco
AU - Montesinos, Rosa
AU - Ruiz-Yaringaño, Arturo Jhonny
AU - Baca, Fiorella
AU - Chambergo-Michilot, Diego
AU - Verástegui, Graciet
AU - Agüero-Flores, Katherine
AU - Cruzdel Castillo, Rossana
AU - Cuenca, José
AU - Huilca, José Carlos
AU - Lanata, Serggio
AU - Bustamante-Paytan, Diego
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Rising dementia prevalence in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), fueled by socio-economic disparities, necessitates accessible brief cognitive tests. The INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) proves effective for detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and early dementia. It prioritizes executive functions, is suitable for low-educated or illiterate individuals, and robust diagnostic capacity. METHOD: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prior patient cohort. Illiterate participants met the following criteria: proficiency in Spanish for over 10 years, age ≥ 60, less than 1 year of formal education, and inability to read and write. Literate patients were aged 60 or older, Spanish speakers, and had a minimum of 6 years of formal education. A clinical evaluation with three consecutive phases was used as gold standard diagnosis, resulting in a final classification based on international criteria. The IFS was applied to all participants. To compare the diagnostic performance of the IFS, a Receiver-Operator Curve (ROC) analysis was conducted. The average scores for each IFS domain were compared among all groups in each cohort using a Wilcoxon test. RESULT: We included 114 controls, 101 MCI patients, and 105 all type dementia patients. Median age was 68 (67-71), 69 (66-71) and 72 (71-75), respectively, and female participants accounted for 45.6%, 47.5% and 45.7% for each group, respectively. An excellent diagnostic performance was found when we evaluated the IFS Total score for discrimination between controls, MCI, and dementia patients across both groups (Fig. 1). The analysis based on the Youden index showed that, the optimal cut-off points for MCI (22 vs 23.7), and dementia patients (17.6 vs 18.3), was lower in illiteracy participants (Table 1). Finally, when evaluating each IFS domain among control patients in both groups, statistically significant differences were found in Digits backward and the Hayling test (p-value <0.001) (Table 2). CONCLUSION: The IFS seems to be useful in assessing both illiterate and literate older adult patients for the presence of MCI and dementia in LMIC settings.
AB - BACKGROUND: Rising dementia prevalence in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), fueled by socio-economic disparities, necessitates accessible brief cognitive tests. The INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) proves effective for detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and early dementia. It prioritizes executive functions, is suitable for low-educated or illiterate individuals, and robust diagnostic capacity. METHOD: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prior patient cohort. Illiterate participants met the following criteria: proficiency in Spanish for over 10 years, age ≥ 60, less than 1 year of formal education, and inability to read and write. Literate patients were aged 60 or older, Spanish speakers, and had a minimum of 6 years of formal education. A clinical evaluation with three consecutive phases was used as gold standard diagnosis, resulting in a final classification based on international criteria. The IFS was applied to all participants. To compare the diagnostic performance of the IFS, a Receiver-Operator Curve (ROC) analysis was conducted. The average scores for each IFS domain were compared among all groups in each cohort using a Wilcoxon test. RESULT: We included 114 controls, 101 MCI patients, and 105 all type dementia patients. Median age was 68 (67-71), 69 (66-71) and 72 (71-75), respectively, and female participants accounted for 45.6%, 47.5% and 45.7% for each group, respectively. An excellent diagnostic performance was found when we evaluated the IFS Total score for discrimination between controls, MCI, and dementia patients across both groups (Fig. 1). The analysis based on the Youden index showed that, the optimal cut-off points for MCI (22 vs 23.7), and dementia patients (17.6 vs 18.3), was lower in illiteracy participants (Table 1). Finally, when evaluating each IFS domain among control patients in both groups, statistically significant differences were found in Digits backward and the Hayling test (p-value <0.001) (Table 2). CONCLUSION: The IFS seems to be useful in assessing both illiterate and literate older adult patients for the presence of MCI and dementia in LMIC settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214493303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/alz.092000
DO - 10.1002/alz.092000
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 39750175
AN - SCOPUS:85214493303
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 20
SP - e092000
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia
ER -